Opinion: the Government's response to the BIS Committee's recommendations for apprenticeships

Chris Jones gives his views on the Government's response to the BIS Committee's recommendations for apprenticeships

25 January 2013 / Be the first to comment

Chris Jones, CEO and Director General of City & Guilds, gives his views on the Government’s response to the BIS Committee’s recommendations for apprenticeships

“The Government’s response to the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee’s recommendations around apprenticeships certainly shows signs of progress. When Doug Richard’s review of apprenticeships was released in December, we were hopeful that the Government would give due attention to its recommendations – and largely this seems to be the case. We hope this will help to ensure apprenticeships are of the highest quality so that apprentices gain the skills they need to succeed in their career.

“However there are still areas for development. Firstly, it seems the Government will not set up a formal structure to embed apprenticeships within the public procurement contract process. I agree that setting strict targets for companies would not be suitable and indeed could isolate SMEs, so the Government is right to consider best practice processes. Nevertheless public procurement could be a viable route to ensuring more high quality apprenticeships that lead to employment are available. We therefore suggest a percentage target – something that would be manageable and realistic to all businesses within a supply chain.

“Another area that needs further development is ensuring apprenticeships are seen as a viable alternative to university degrees – something the Government has frequently voiced its support for. And yet they will not be moving forward with the recommendation that schools publish the number of apprenticeship entries alongside the number of university places secured. Apprenticeships are a valuable route to career success, but this is not recognised as widely as it should be; actions such as publishing apprenticeship entries could be a good first step towards changing perception, so it is disappointing that this recommendation has not been taken on board.

“Going forward, we want to continue to work with Government and employers to develop high quality apprenticeships, and look forward to Government’s response to the Richard Review and how we can support more employers to deliver even better apprenticeships."

Comments 0 Comment

Add your comment

All comments will be subject to moderation, please refer to the terms and conditions of the blog.

SCHOOL LEAVERS DEMAND VOCATIONAL LEARNING

Our research reveals that three quarters of young people demand skills-based training to achieve their ambitions Read full research article

OUR THINKING

Kirstie Donnelly

Kirstie Donnelly comment on Coates Review

Read blog post

Kirstie Donnelly

You want to narrow the gender pay gap? Tackle the ‘gender career gap’ first

Read blog post

Kirstie Donnelly

The Coming of Age of FE

Read blog post

Chris Jones

Apprenticeships: what's in a name?

Read blog post

Read more blog posts